// Demos
Every worked example, including the misses
Public, no sign-in required. Interactive target pages for every RNA and protein target referenced throughout this site — the same pipeline output a paying customer sees, with the PDF report downloadable from inside each one. The clean recoveries and the honest limitations both, including the two protein targets where the correct pocket is real but ranked second, not first (FKBP12, ADRB2). Numbers are cross-referenced against real deposited PDB structures, not estimated.
// RNA
Full evidence-layer reports
Family classification, known ligand precedent, conservation, similar known RNAs, and PLIP interaction fingerprints alongside the ranked pocket clusters — the same evidence layer as the Protein section below.
HCV IRES domain IIa
Strict @1 · 80%55 nt viral RNA element (PDB 1P5M) — full evidence-layer report.
Family classification, known ligand precedent, conservation, similar known RNAs, and PLIP interaction fingerprints alongside the ranked pocket clusters. The rank-1 pocket recovers 8 of 10 real binding-site residues (80%) — strict top-1 — from the predicted apo structure alone. The binding site itself is cross-referenced by sequence alignment from a different PDB entry (3TZR), which is why the plain benchmark card below keeps this out of the locked seven-target count.
FMN riboswitch (5C45)
Near @1 · 40%54 nt, single-sequence prediction — full evidence-layer report.
Same target as the 5C45 benchmark card below, with the full evidence layer added on top: family classification, ligand precedent, conservation, similar known RNAs, and PLIP interaction fingerprints. Global backbone RMSD is a poor 10.2 Å, but the rank-1 cluster still recovers 40% of the real FMN binding-site residues — near, not strict.
// Protein
Nine real drug discovery targets
All nine have the full interactive report — structure viewer, family classification, PLIP interaction fingerprints, structural neighbors, ClinVar + UniProt functional overlap, and rules-based confidence flags. HSP90AA1 and BRD4 are canonical fragment-based drug discovery targets — see the fragment discovery write-up for what this platform surfaces for that workflow specifically.
CDK2
Rank 1 · 22/22Kinase, 298 aa — canonical ATP-competitive site.
Clean rank-1 recovery: the top-ranked pocket cluster contains all 22 of 22 real ATP-site contact residues from a real co-crystal structure (PDB 1HCK) — 100% — including the hinge residues and the catalytic lysine. Whole-chain CA RMSD vs. 1HCK is 1.87 Å, 0.82 Å on the core domain excluding the activation loop (known to be flexible without cyclin bound).
BRD4 (bromodomain 1)
Rank 1 · 12/14Epigenetic reader, 1362 aa full-length — the acetyl-lysine pocket behind the BET-inhibitor chemical series.
Clean rank-1 recovery: 86% of the real JQ1 contact residues (PDB 3MXF), including the signature Asn140 hydrogen bond. CA RMSD vs. 3MXF is 0.89 Å on the folded BD1 domain. Full-length BRD4 has two bromodomains and large disordered linker regions; the ranker correctly ignored the disorder and landed on the folded BD1 pocket — the viewer’s confidence coloring shows the disordered regions as low-confidence extended chain rather than folded structure, which is what AlphaFold actually predicts for them.
Carbonic anhydrase II
Rank 1 · 8/11Metalloenzyme, 260 aa — classic fragment-screening validation target.
The strongest structural match in the batch: rank-1 recovery of 8 of 11 real pocket-wall residues (PDB 2CBA) around the catalytic zinc, including the full His94/His96/His119 coordinating triad.
MDM2
Rank 1 · 8/22PPI target, 491 aa — the p53-binding groove nutlin-class inhibitors occupy.
Rank-1 recovery of the real p53-binding interface (PDB 1YCR, the p53-peptide co-crystal) — 8 of 22 real contact residues, landing precisely on the druggable PPI cleft rather than the disordered regions elsewhere in this 491-residue protein.
KRAS G12C
Rank 1 · 6/21GTPase, 189 aa — the switch-II cryptic pocket that made this target druggable.
Rank-1 recovery of the real switch-II/sotorasib pocket (PDB 6OIM) — 6 of 21 real ligand-contact residues, spanning the P-loop, switch I, and switch II. Found unprompted, on the single most demo-relevant oncology target in this batch.
HSP90AA1 (N-terminal domain)
Rank 2 · 18/19Chaperone, 732 aa — one of the most fragment-screened ATP pockets in structural biology.
The honest limitation, stated plainly: the real geldanamycin pocket (PDB 1YET) is present in the report, extremely well-resolved — 95% real contact-residue overlap — but ranked #2, not #1. Naive whole-domain RMSD is a poor 12.8 Å, almost entirely driven by the well-documented N-domain "lid" that closes on ligand binding; the core domain matches at 0.70 Å. Real induced-fit flexibility, plausibly the same reason the ranker didn’t put it first.
FKBP12
Rank 2 · 2/14Immunophilin, 108 aa — the textbook NMR/fragment-screening pocket.
The honest limitation, stated plainly: the real FK506/rapamycin pocket (PDB 1FKJ) is present in the report, correctly identified — but ranked #2, not #1. This was the batch’s own designated sanity-anchor target, chosen specifically because a miss here would call the rest of the batch into question. The pocket wasn’t missed; it was demoted.
ADRB2 (β2-adrenergic receptor)
Rank 2 · 20/20GPCR, 413 aa — known-difficult target class, no membrane context in the model.
Deliberately picked as a known-difficult case: this AlphaFold DB model has no lipid-bilayer context for a 7-transmembrane receptor. The real orthosteric pocket (PDB 2RH1, carazolol-bound) is nonetheless fully recovered — all 20 of 20 real contact residues — but at rank 2, not rank 1. A geometry win and a ranking miss, reported as both.
TEM-1 β-lactamase
Ensemble-only · allostericEnzyme, 286 aa — an ensemble-vs-static demonstration, not a ligand-recovery benchmark.
A different kind of finding: the rank-1 pocket only appears in later ANM ensemble frames, absent from the static AlphaFold structure. It lands on a real, independently-published allosteric site (the H3–H4 loop, Ambler numbering 99–114) — not the specific Bowman-lab cryptic pocket this target was originally chosen to test against. We checked the published literature directly rather than assume the original hypothesis held, and report the corrected finding, not the original claim.
// RNA — worked examples
Locked-benchmark cleft-binder targets
The plainer worked examples that used to live at /druggability — structure, ensemble, and ranked pockets, without the evidence layer above. Six locked-benchmark cells plus one apo→holo detection showcase.
TPP riboswitch (2GDI)
Strict @1 · 71%78 nt, single-sequence prediction.
Clean rank-1 recovery on a canonical cleft-binder target: 71% of the real TPP binding-site residues land in the top-ranked pocket cluster.
TPP riboswitch, thi-box (2HOJ)
Strict @1 · 53%83 nt, single-sequence prediction.
Strict rank-1 recovery (53%) despite a high 14.0 Å global RMSD — the same local-vs-global pattern as 5C45, on a different TPP-family member.
THF riboswitch (4LVV)
Strict @1 · 50%89 nt, MSA-driven prediction (opt-in path).
The pre-pilot tractability screen correctly flags 4LVV for the MSA path; single-sequence prediction alone misses the site (19% overlap), MSA lifts it to strict recovery (50%). The case for screening before predicting, not after.
FMN riboswitch (5C45)
Near @1 · 40%54 nt, single-sequence prediction — smallest target in the benchmark.
Global backbone RMSD is a poor 10.2 Å, but the rank-1 cluster still recovers 40% of the real FMN binding-site residues — near, not strict. The case for reporting local pocket quality alongside global fold quality, not instead of it. (The evidence-layer version of this same target is above, in the RNA section.)
SAM-I riboswitch (2GIS)
Near @1 · 38%94 nt, single-sequence prediction.
Near-recovery (38%) on a SAM-I riboswitch — real signal, below the strict threshold.
B12 riboswitch (4GXY)
Near @1 · 35%161 nt, MSA-driven prediction — largest RNA target in the benchmark.
Near-recovery (35%) even with the MSA path engaged. The pre-pilot screen correctly identifies this target as tractable for MSA mode; recovery still falls short of strict — structure quality, not scoring, is the limiting factor here.
FMN riboswitch, apo→holo
Detection · not rank-1112 nt, ligand-free apo input (PDB 6WJR) — a detection cross-validation, not a ranking claim.
Given only the empty structure, the pipeline recovers 50% of the real FMN contact residues from a co-crystal (3F2Q) at a 0.63 Å nearest-atom distance — but the pocket ranks #6, not #1, because riboswitch pockets are induced-fit and only fully form once the ligand binds. Shown as a detection result, deliberately not folded into any rank-1 claim.
// Experimental — provider-preview capability
Ligand-conditioned co-folding
A separate, honest look at OpenFold3-preview’s apo→holo co-folding on five targets — three RNA, two protein — against real experimental ground truth. Not part of the benchmarked capability above; kept distinct on purpose.
Want a target from your own program run through the pipeline? See the engagement models on the main page, read the findings that qualify our own assumptions, or reach out directly.
Get in touch