// Worked examples

See the pipeline output

Each worked example is the same pipeline a paying customer runs — predicted 3D structure, five-frame conformational ensemble, RNA-applicable pocket ranking, and a downloadable bundle with full per-cluster metadata. Numbers are locked benchmark cells; reproducer is on the methodology page.

78 nt · single-seqlive

TPP riboswitch (2GDI)

Strict@1, 71% overlap. The canonical single-seq win.

Single-sequence arm. The pre-pilot screen does not flag 2GDI for MSA mode (min_id 0.761). The pipeline recovers the TPP binding-site cluster at rank 1 with 71% residue overlap — well above the 50% strict threshold. fpocket druggability score on the rank-1 cluster is 0.00; the geometric ranker recovers it on persistence and binding-residue stability.

strict@1overlap 71%single-seq
Open 2GDI demo
83 nt · single-seqlive

Thi-box TPP (2HOJ)

Strict@1 at 53% even with backbone RMSD 14 Å — local geometry preserved.

Worst backbone fit in the v0.2 benchmark (RMSD 13.95 Å) yet the rank-1 cluster strictly recovers the binding site at 53% overlap. The TPP-binding pocket geometry is preserved within the prediction even as the global fold drifts. The companion piece to 5C45 (poor fold, NEAR) and 2GIS (good fold, NEAR).

strict@1overlap 53%high RMSD
Open 2HOJ demo
89 nt · MSAlive

THF riboswitch (4LVV)

MSA recovers strict@1 where single-seq gave neither (19% → 50%).

The pre-pilot screen flags 4LVV for MSA mode (min_id 0.762, diverse-tail homologs present). Single-seq arm: rank-1 cluster at 19% overlap — neither strict nor near. MSA arm: rank-1 cluster at 50% overlap — strict@1. The customer-facing message: on this kind of target, the opt-in MSA path is what produces recovery.

strict@1overlap 50%msa opt-in
Open 4LVV demo
94 nt · single-seqlive

SAM-I riboswitch (2GIS)

Best-quality structure in the benchmark (pLDDT 0.82, RMSD 1.3 Å); near@1 at 38%.

Pre-pilot screen excludes MSA (min_id 0.780, no diverse tail). The single-seq prediction is the best in the benchmark by both structure metrics — pLDDT 0.822 and backbone RMSD 1.33 Å — yet the rank-1 cluster lands at 38% overlap: near@1, not strict. Geometry quality is necessary but not sufficient.

near@1overlap 38%low RMSD
Open 2GIS demo
54 nt · single-seqlive

FMN riboswitch (5C45)

Near@1 at 40% overlap. Smallest target (54 nt); backbone RMSD 10 Å.

Smallest target in the v0.2 benchmark. Pre-pilot screen excludes MSA (min_id 0.808, no diverse tail). Backbone RMSD 10.2 Å against the deposited co-crystal — by global-fold standards, poor. The rank-1 cluster nonetheless picks up 40% of the FMN binding-site residues: above near@1, below strict@1. We ship this case because it makes the global-vs-local quality gap explicit.

near@1overlap 40%high RMSD
Open 5C45 demo
161 nt · MSAlive

B12 riboswitch (4GXY)

Longest target (161 nt). MSA produces near@1 where single-seq is neither (18% → 35%).

Longest target in the v0.2 benchmark and the only one that triggers the screen on both criteria (min_id 0.705 AND 29.5% homologs in the diverse 70–80% identity band). Single-seq lands at 18% overlap (neither); MSA lifts the rank-1 cluster to 35% (near@1). Pairs with 4LVV to define the empirical range over which MSA mode adds value.

near@1overlap 35%msa opt-in
Open 4GXY demo

// Full benchmark

Seven cleft-binder targets with strict@1, near@1 and overlap percentages. Including the one out-of-scope neither case.

See benchmark →

// Methodology

Full pipeline, third-party attribution and licences, strict@K / near@K definitions, scope and limitations.

Read methodology →

// Pilot pricing

Per-target Explorer pilot or multi-target Discovery campaign. EU jurisdiction; zero-retention option on Enterprise.

See pricing →